ISSN : 1226-4946(Print)
ISSN : 2288-5412(Online)
ISSN : 2288-5412(Online)
The Yeats Journal of Korea Vol.52 pp.57-79
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.14354/yjk.2017.52.57
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.14354/yjk.2017.52.57
Yeats’s and Maeterlinck’s Dramatic Symbolism
Abstract
The symbols of crumbling towers, deep wells or fountains, and impassablethresholds belong to Yeats as much as they belong to Maeterlinck, indeed as theybelong to a whole generation. So, this paper focuses on similarities and disparities inthe symbolism of Yeats and Maeterlinck, that is, in their conception and use ofsymbols. In their essays, Yeats and Maeterlinck express a similar conception.Literature is by essence symbolic. To them, symbol is not the simple image of anabstract idea; symbol has its roots beyond reason; it is of divine essence. Thecomparison between two plays, On Baile’s Strand by Yeats and The Death ofTintagiles by Maeterlinck, will reveal a special form of “dramatic symbolism” thatemerges from those ideas, at the turn of the 19th century: Maeterlinck goes as far asbelieving that the author must be a passive receptor of the divine symbols whereasYeats believes in the writer’s creative power. It explains greatly the differentdramaturgical choices they made.
예이츠와 메터링크의 극적 상징
초록
무너지는 탑, 깊은 샘이나 분수, 넘을 수 없는 분지방의 상징은 메터링크에게 만큼 예이츠에 해당되며, 사실 전세대에 해당된다. 따라서 이 논문은 예이츠와메터링크의 상징의 동일성이나 차별성에 주목하는데, 상징의 구상과 사용을 보려고 한다. 이들은 자신들의 글에서 비슷한 개념을 설명한다. 문학은 본질적으로 상징적이다.그들은 상징과 알레고리를 구별하는데, 상징은 단순한 추상적 개념의 이미지는 아니며, 상징은 이성 너머에 뿌리가 있고, 신성한 본질이 있다. 예이츠의
-
-
Submission : JAMS
https://yjk.jams.or.kr/
-
YSK
The Yeats Society of Korea
-
Editorial Office
Contact Information- Tel: +82-2-2220-4477
- E-mail: ilhwan_y@hanyang.ac.kr -
-
-
-
-
-
